Unit Economics Wiki
ARR and MRR
MRR normalises the value of eligible active recurring contracts to a month, and ARR annualises that run rate under a documented eligibility policy — neither is GAAP revenue.
Snapshot
What it is
MRR is the normalised monthly value of eligible active recurring contracts. ARR is the same recurring run rate expressed annually — most often MRR × 12.
MRR = eligible recurring contract value / contracted months
ARR = MRR × 12
Why it matters
It states the size of the contracted recurring base today, months before that base appears in trailing recognised revenue — which is exactly why the eligibility policy behind it has to be written down.
What it is not
ARR is not GAAP revenue, not a non-GAAP measure derived from GAAP revenue, not bookings, not cash, and not a forecast. No accounting standard defines it. It is a point-in-time operating metric produced under a policy the company writes itself.
Key takeaways
ARR is a point-in-time measure, like a balance-sheet item. Revenue covers a period, like an income-statement item. They do not reconcile without a bridge.
The formula is trivial; the eligibility policy is the whole metric. Usage overages, minimums, services, trials, delinquent accounts, and expired-but-renegotiating contracts are all policy choices.
Never publish ending ARR alone. Publish the movement bridge: opening, new, expansion, contraction, churn, closing.
Never annualise a single strong usage month and call the result contracted ARR.
Two honest companies can report different ARR for identical contracts. Compare definitions, not labels.
On this page10 sections
What are ARR and MRR?#
Both measure the same thing at different frequencies: the annualised value of recurring contracts that are live at a moment in time. The SaaS Metrics Standards Board's ARR standard makes the point that trips people up most — ARR is a measure at a point in time, like a balance-sheet item, whereas revenue is calculated over a period, like an income-statement item. It excludes one-time fees and professional services even when those fees recur, and it excludes expected churn, down-sells and up-sells.
Public issuers write their own versions, and the differences are instructive:
| Issuer | How ARR is built | The policy detail worth copying |
|---|---|---|
Vertex | Most recent month's MRR × 12; MRR is the software subscription price, inclusive of discounts, divided by the number of covered months | Discounts sit inside the metric, not in a footnote to it |
Workday | Each subscription contract annualised as total contract value ÷ days in term × 365 | Excludes short-term contracts distinct from the core product, such as implementation and test tenants |
Similarweb | Annualised value of active subscription contracts, excluding one-time and non-subscription revenue | States plainly that ARR is not a substitute for GAAP revenue, RPO or deferred revenue |
Workday's disclosure contains the most under-copied policy line in SaaS reporting: where it is negotiating a renewal after a subscription has expired, ARR is only adjusted if the customer churns. That is a defensible choice. It also makes ARR look better than a policy that drops expired contracts on day one. Neither is wrong; only one of them is disclosed.
Why does the distinction from GAAP revenue matter?#
Because founders are routinely asked to reconcile numbers that are not supposed to reconcile. Cash collected, billings, bookings, deferred revenue, remaining performance obligations, ARR and recognised revenue can all differ in the same month with nothing wrong anywhere.
| Measure | What it counts | Timing |
|---|---|---|
Bookings | Contracts signed | At signature |
Billings | Amounts invoiced | At invoice |
Cash collected | Money received | At payment |
Deferred revenue | Billed but unearned | Balance sheet, at a date |
RPO | Contracted revenue not yet recognised | Balance sheet, at a date |
ARR / MRR | Annualised value of live recurring contracts | Point in time, company policy |
GAAP revenue | Performance obligations satisfied | Over a period, under the standard |
The practical consequence: a company can grow ARR 40% in a year in which recognised revenue grows 20%, because ARR captures the exit run rate and revenue captures the average of the year. Both statements are true. Only one of them is auditable.
Key Facts
The standards body treats ARR as a point-in-time measure and excludes recurring services
The SaaS Metrics Standards Board's ARR standard defines ARR as annualised subscription recurring revenue, excludes one-time fees and professional services even if they recur, excludes expected churn, up-sells and down-sells, and describes ARR as a point-in-time measure "much like a Balance Sheet item."
SaaS Metrics Standards Board, Annual Recurring Revenue standardCompany definitions differ in ways that move the number
Vertex builds ARR from the most recent month's MRR multiplied by twelve, where MRR is the subscription price inclusive of discounts divided by the number of covered months.
Vertex, Inc. FY2025 Form 10-KAn expired contract can legitimately stay in ARR
Workday annualises each contract as total contract value ÷ days in term × 365, excludes sub-one-year contracts such as implementation and test tenants, and — where a renewal is being negotiated after expiry — adjusts ARR only if the customer churns. Its gross revenue retention rate was approximately 97% as of 30 April 2026.
Workday, Inc. Form 10-Q, quarter ended 30 April 2026Issuers say out loud that ARR is not GAAP revenue
Similarweb states that ARR "is not necessarily indicative of future GAAP revenue" and that investors "should not consider ARR as a substitute for revenue recognized under GAAP" or for remaining performance obligations or deferred revenue — because GAAP revenue is recognised as performance obligations are satisfied and includes one-time and non-subscription amounts that ARR excludes.
Similarweb Q4 and fiscal 2025 results, 17 February 2026Contract mix inside ARR is itself a disclosure
Similarweb reported that multi-year subscriptions reached 60% of ARR at 31 December 2025, up from 49% a year earlier, and that its 454 customers with ARR of $100,000 or more — up 12% year over year — accounted for 63% of total ARR. Same headline metric, very different durability and concentration profiles.
Similarweb Q4 and fiscal 2025 resultsHow do you calculate ARR without fooling yourself?#
1. Write the eligibility policy before the formula#
Decide, in writing, whether each of these sits inside or outside recurring value:
| Item | Usual treatment | Why it is contested |
|---|---|---|
Subscription and support fees | In | Core recurring value |
Committed usage minimums | In | Contractual floor, genuinely recurring |
Variable consumption above the minimum | Label separately | Not contracted; annualising it invents visibility |
Implementation and professional services | Out | One-time, even when the customer buys it every year |
Contracts shorter than 12 months | Policy call | Workday excludes test tenants; others include all live contracts |
Monthly cancellable plans | Usually in, flagged | High churn risk sitting inside a metric named "annual" |
Delinquent or paused accounts | Policy call | Set a days-overdue cut-off and hold it |
Expired, renewal in negotiation | Policy call | Workday keeps it until churn; a stricter policy removes it at expiry |
2. Normalise, then annualise#
MRR = eligible contract value ÷ contracted months, then ARR = MRR × 12. Use the contract's own term as the denominator — a 24-month contract normalises over 24 months, not 12.
3. Build the movement bridge#
closing MRR = opening MRR + new + expansion − contraction − churn
Keep reactivations, foreign exchange, acquisitions and policy changes as separate visible lines when material. A total that moved for four reasons should be presented with four lines.
4. Reconcile to the accounting#
Show a short bridge from ARR to trailing recognised revenue that names the differences: term timing, services, non-subscription revenue, contract modifications, and the fact that ARR is an exit run rate rather than a period average.
5. Segment before anyone asks#
Report recurring value by product, customer size, geography, contract length and cohort. A growing total routinely hides a deteriorating segment — see Cohort Analysis.
6. Version the definition#
If the policy changes, restate prior periods or show the change as an explicit bridge item. A metric that improves because the policy changed is a governance event, not a growth event.
Worked example#
A SaaS company opens September with $150,000 MRR. During the month: new customers add $10,000, existing customers expand $7,000, contractions remove $2,000, churn removes $3,000.
closing MRR = $150,000 + $10,000 + $7,000 − $2,000 − $3,000
= $162,000
closing ARR = $162,000 × 12 = $1,944,000
The services line. The company also signs $50,000 of one-time implementation work. That becomes GAAP revenue as the work is performed. It is excluded from ARR under the eligibility policy — and it would also be excluded under the SaaS Metrics Standards Board standard even if the customer bought implementation every single year.
The prepaid contract. One new customer pays $120,000 upfront for a 12-month subscription starting 1 September:
contract MRR = $120,000 ÷ 12 = $10,000
contract ARR = $10,000 × 12 = $120,000
cash collected in September = $120,000
Under a simple ratable-service assumption, roughly $10,000 of that becomes revenue each month and the remaining balance sits in deferred revenue. One contract, three different September numbers — $120,000 of cash, $120,000 of ARR, about $10,000 of revenue — and none of them is an error. The actual recognition pattern depends on the contract and the applicable standard.
The usage trap. A consumption customer has a $2,000 monthly committed minimum and used $8,000 of variable capacity last month.
Contracted MRR = $2,000 → contracted ARR = $24,000
Total run rate last month = $10,000 → annualised = $120,000
Reporting $120,000 as ARR claims five times the contractual visibility the company actually holds. The honest presentation is $24,000 contracted ARR + $96,000 annualised variable run rate, with the variable component shown on a trailing-three-month average so a single spike cannot drive the headline.
The caveat that matters: the × 12 is an assumption that this month repeats twelve times. For a contracted subscription that assumption is nearly free. For consumption revenue it is the risk, and the multiplication hides it.
What are the common mistakes?#
- Calling ARR revenue. It is a point-in-time operating run rate produced under a company policy. Say so in the same sentence you first use it.
- Annualising a peak usage month. Separate committed minimums from variable consumption and label each.
- Folding one-time services into the recurring base. Implementation, migration and custom work inflate scale and depress the gross margin that ARR implicitly promises.
- Publishing ending ARR without the bridge. The same $1.9M can be built from healthy new business or from one expansion masking broad churn.
- Changing the eligibility policy quietly. If expired-contract or delinquency treatment changes, the growth is definitional. Restate or disclose.
When does ARR break as a metric?#
When revenue is not contractual. Transactional marketplaces, seasonal consumption, advertising and episodic services have no recurring base to annualise. Trailing revenue, gross bookings, committed minimums or remaining performance obligations describe those businesses better.
When churn is monthly and real. A cancellable month-to-month plan sitting inside a metric named "annual" implies twelve months of visibility the contract does not grant. Pair it with churn rate.
When the renewal is unresolved. Two companies with identical expired contracts can report different ARR purely on grace-period policy. That is a comparability failure rather than an accuracy failure — and it is why benchmarking a peer's ARR growth without reading their definition is close to meaningless.
When the question is actually about economics. ARR is silent on margin, collection risk, concentration and support burden. A dollar of recurring revenue from a high-touch, low-margin customer is not equivalent to a dollar from a self-serve one. Pair it with gross margin, NRR and GRR and cash collection.
Frequently asked questions
01Is ARR a non-GAAP financial measure?
Not in the technical sense. A non-GAAP measure is derived by adjusting a GAAP measure, which triggers reconciliation and labelling requirements. ARR is an operating metric with no GAAP starting point at all — so it attracts less scrutiny, not more. Treat that as a reason for stricter self-discipline: state the policy, keep it stable, and never present ARR where a reader would reasonably expect revenue.
02Should usage-based revenue be in ARR?
The contracted minimum, yes. Variable consumption above it, only as a separately labelled annualised run rate on a trailing average. If most of your revenue is variable, ARR is the wrong headline metric and a trailing-twelve-month revenue figure is more honest.
03Do we include an expired contract while we negotiate the renewal?
Either policy is defensible; the disclosure is not optional. Workday keeps ARR unchanged until the customer actually churns. A stricter policy removes the contract at expiry. Pick one, write the grace period down in days, and apply it to good and bad quarters alike.
04ARR grew 40% but revenue grew 20%. Which one is wrong?
Probably neither. ARR is an exit run rate; revenue is a period average. If bookings landed late in the year, ARR growth outruns revenue growth by construction and the gap closes the following year. Show both, with the timing bridge.
05What is the minimum ARR reporting a seed-stage board should see?
Opening ARR, the five bridge lines, closing ARR, the eligibility policy in one paragraph, and the split between contracted and variable value. Anything less and the board is reviewing a number rather than a business.
Related concepts#
- SaaS — connect recurring contracts to service delivery and accounting.
- Subscription Model — design the recurring entitlement and renewal terms that ARR measures.
- Usage-Based Pricing — understand why consumption revenue resists annualisation.
- Churn Rate — measure lost logos and lost recurring value.
- NRR and GRR — build the existing-customer revenue bridge.
- Cohort Analysis — keep acquisition periods and customer age comparable.
- Gross Margin — test the delivery economics behind the recurring line.
- Burn Multiple — relate cash consumption to net new ARR.
Sources#
- SaaS Metrics Standards Board, Annual Recurring Revenue standard; accessed 13 August 2026. Source for ARR as a point-in-time measure, the exclusion of one-time fees and professional services even when recurring, and the exclusion of expected churn and up-sells.
- Vertex, Inc., Form 10-K for the year ended 31 December 2025. Source for the ARR-from-most-recent-month's-MRR construction and the discount-inclusive MRR definition.
- Workday, Inc., Form 10-Q for the quarter ended 30 April 2026. Source for the contract-value ÷ days × 365 annualisation, the exclusion of implementation and test tenants, the renewal-negotiation policy, and the approximately 97% gross revenue retention rate.
- Similarweb Ltd., Fourth Quarter and Fiscal 2025 Results, 17 February 2026. Source for the ARR-is-not-GAAP-revenue language, the multi-year share of ARR, and the $100,000+ customer count and ARR concentration.
- US Securities and Exchange Commission, Division of Corporation Finance, Non-GAAP Financial Measures Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations, last updated 13 December 2022. Source for the labelling and reconciliation discipline that operating metrics presented alongside GAAP results should borrow.
Note: This page is educational and does not constitute accounting, tax, legal, or investment advice. ARR and MRR are unstandardised operating metrics, and the way they are presented in investor materials is subject to rules that vary by jurisdiction and filing status. Consult a qualified accountant or securities counsel before using them in fundraising or reporting materials.
Author
Dr. Sarah Zou
Independent economist · EconNova
Commercial strategy for technical products, with a focus on pricing, unit economics, and the operating choices behind the model.
About SarahTopics
Cite this page
Canonical URL
https://sarahzou.com/wiki/unit-economics/arr-mrrSuggested citation
Zou, S. (2026). ARR and MRR: Building a Defensible Recurring-Revenue Metric. In Unit Economics. Pricing & Monetization Wiki. https://sarahzou.com/wiki/unit-economics/arr-mrr
Open license
Reuse with attribution
This content is available for reuse. When referencing or republishing it, please credit Dr. Sarah Zou and link back to the original source.
Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International. You may share and adapt the material with appropriate credit.